As far as I'm concerned, this thread isn't about removing anything except stale or unclear information from the website. Removing the projects themselves has never been on the table.
Justin On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:03 PM Arthur Naseef <a...@amlinv.com> wrote: > So if this is an "outsider looking in," then as one of the insiders, let's > put this to bed. CPP and NMS are used and are not ready to be removed. > > Art > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:22 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > My view is that its a discussion around the status of some components, > > which came up as part of working on an encompassing problem; the > > website. While working toward improvements there Justin has asked what > > I think are reasonable enough questions around the status of these > > bits. > > > > My outsider-looking-in (its an area I don't contribute) view on them > > is that they haven't have an active enough community around them > > lately. I'm happy if that turns out not to be the case, but I think is > > what this thread seeks to try and determine. In part, I think > > discussions like this are good precisely so that folks dont find > > themselves in the kinds of situation you outline below. Its great that > > you have the knowledge and are also willing to help here. > > > > In that particular reply I was asking for clarity on the mail as I > > wasnt sure what its saying, and I think clarity is important here. I > > was not looking to attack anyone, if thats what you felt. > > > > Robbie > > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 16:49, Arthur Naseef <a...@amlinv.com> wrote: > > > > > > What are we doing with this thread? Trying to get individual > commitments > > > to putting time into some vague possibility of needed effort in the > > future? > > > > > > Just reading this thread is discouraging. I long to be part of a > > community > > > that works together to constructively solve problems - real problems. > > One > > > of the last ActiveMQ efforts on which I offered to assist was a CVE in > > > which I said I didn't have time to do all the work but would gladly > help > > > others. Nobody else stepped up to help and I ended up doing most of > the > > > work, with Christopher Shannon stepping up to wrap up the CVE > management > > > and release, IIRC. So if we are just looking to attack one another > with > > > "you don't help," we can stop - we've reached that place already. > > > > > > BTW, I have more than enough knowledge to help with the ActiveMQ-CPP > > > project, so anyone looking at issues there can reach out to me and we > can > > > work *together* on it. NMS, I can also do, but I definitely have a > much > > > larger gap to getting NMS built and tested, especially since I really > > don't > > > know C#. Give me a shout via email or on slack if you want to reach > me. > > > > > > Art > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:02 AM Robbie Gemmell < > robbie.gemm...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > To be clear Jamie, is this you saying you intend to help maintain the > > > > CPP client going forward? > > > > > > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 14:37, Jamie G. <jamie.goody...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > I'm still alive - learning life as a new parent, slipping a little > on > > > > > reading all the threads for projects I contribute too (Apache, > Linux > > > > > Foundation, etc). > > > > > > > > > > In regards to contributing to CPP client, I picked on some issues > > > > > there earlier in the year. Discovered that master branch was not > the > > > > > primary maintained branch. After some discussion its clearer how > > > > > future maintenance, and bug fixes can occur. That information was > not > > > > > clear to find, it only became clear after rejected PRs. > > > > > > > > > > Given its not always clear what is happening with a sub project if > > its > > > > > not very active, clear readmes and docs are very nice to have. I > > would > > > > > like to see them stay, minimally as APIs. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:50 AM jgenender <jgenen...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Justin, what seems to be the problem? Not everyone follows every > > > > thread, so > > > > > > they don't always speak up. They don't have to. The JIRA and > > > > comments in > > > > > > past threads speak for themselves. I am simply pointing that > out. > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems like you are trying to kill this. You have had a couple > > of > > > > people > > > > > > say there is value. If you want to cut the web part of it > because > > its > > > > a > > > > > > PITA, thats fine by me. But the APIs as projects should stay. > If > > you > > > > want > > > > > > to link back to old doc, so be it. > > > > > > > > > > > > -1 from me to removing those code bases. I am open to leaving > > them as > > > > a > > > > > > sub-project for code only with a nice readme.md. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Sent from: > > > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > > > > > > >
