To be clear Jamie, is this you saying you intend to help maintain the CPP client going forward?
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 14:37, Jamie G. <jamie.goody...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm still alive - learning life as a new parent, slipping a little on > reading all the threads for projects I contribute too (Apache, Linux > Foundation, etc). > > In regards to contributing to CPP client, I picked on some issues > there earlier in the year. Discovered that master branch was not the > primary maintained branch. After some discussion its clearer how > future maintenance, and bug fixes can occur. That information was not > clear to find, it only became clear after rejected PRs. > > Given its not always clear what is happening with a sub project if its > not very active, clear readmes and docs are very nice to have. I would > like to see them stay, minimally as APIs. > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:50 AM jgenender <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Justin, what seems to be the problem? Not everyone follows every thread, so > > they don't always speak up. They don't have to. The JIRA and comments in > > past threads speak for themselves. I am simply pointing that out. > > > > It seems like you are trying to kill this. You have had a couple of people > > say there is value. If you want to cut the web part of it because its a > > PITA, thats fine by me. But the APIs as projects should stay. If you want > > to link back to old doc, so be it. > > > > -1 from me to removing those code bases. I am open to leaving them as a > > sub-project for code only with a nice readme.md. > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
