Yeah - there are some nice properties of that indeed. As I said - no strong
opinion, but I wonder what others think about it :)

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:03 AM Ry Walker <[email protected]> wrote:

> I do think it’s one of the fun and impressive things about airflow, and an
> easy first commit that can lead to more.
>
> As long as it’s near the bottom it’s not doing any harm.
>
> -Ry
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 7:55 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think README.md for Airflow should contain some most important topics.
> I
> >
> > started to wonder if the README file is the best place for the list of
> >
> > companies using Airflow?
> >
> >
> >
> > I have no strong opinion either way but it feels a bit awkward to keep
> such
> >
> > a long list in README (especially that it becomes automatically part of
> the
> >
> > PyPI release docs:  https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow/  ). The
> > README
> >
> > list predates  https://airflow.apache.org  - and maybe it would be
> better
> >
> > to keep the list there?
> >
> >
> >
> > WDYT? Any strong opinions or reasoning why the list should/should not be
> in
> >
> > the README ?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > Jarek Potiuk
> >
> > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
> >
> >
> >
> > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> >
> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
> >
> > --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>


-- 

Jarek Potiuk
Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer

M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
[image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>

Reply via email to