Keep in mind that if it gets moved, it won’t get updated nearly as often
(less of an incentive) so I’d say it should be a keep or delete decision.

-Ry


On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 6:05 AM Deng Xiaodong <xd.den...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Personally I think it does not fit the scope of README very well, and does
>
> make the file unnecessarily long.
>
>
>
> So I would suggest to move it somewhere else too.
>
>
>
>
>
> XD
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:43 Tomasz Urbaszek <turbas...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I agree with Sumit. Regarding opening a PR - Airflow website is also an
>
> >
>
> > open project :)
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Tomek
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:16 AM Sumit Maheshwari <
> sumeet.ma...@gmail.com>
>
> >
>
> > wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > Not sure, if I've seen such a list with any other open-source project.
>
> > So I
>
> >
>
> > > feel it's a bit awkward to list 100s of different companies and people
>
> >
>
> > > names on the main page of an Apache project.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Hence, +1 from my side to move the list somewhere else.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 1:35 PM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com
> >
>
> >
>
> > > wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Yeah - there are some nice properties of that indeed. As I said - no
>
> >
>
> > > strong
>
> >
>
> > > > opinion, but I wonder what others think about it :)
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:03 AM Ry Walker <r...@rywalker.com> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > I do think it’s one of the fun and impressive things about airflow,
>
> > and
>
> >
>
> > > > an
>
> >
>
> > > > > easy first commit that can lead to more.
>
> >
>
> > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > As long as it’s near the bottom it’s not doing any harm.
>
> >
>
> > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > -Ry
>
> >
>
> > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 7:55 PM Jarek Potiuk <
>
> > jarek.pot...@polidea.com
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > I think README.md for Airflow should contain some most important
>
> >
>
> > > > topics.
>
> >
>
> > > > > I
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > started to wonder if the README file is the best place for the
> list
>
> >
>
> > > of
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > companies using Airflow?
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > I have no strong opinion either way but it feels a bit awkward to
>
> >
>
> > > keep
>
> >
>
> > > > > such
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > a long list in README (especially that it becomes automatically
>
> > part
>
> >
>
> > > of
>
> >
>
> > > > > the
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > PyPI release docs:  https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow/  ).
>
> > The
>
> >
>
> > > > > > README
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > list predates  https://airflow.apache.org  - and maybe it would
> be
>
> >
>
> > > > > better
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > to keep the list there?
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > WDYT? Any strong opinions or reasoning why the list should/should
>
> > not
>
> >
>
> > > > be
>
> >
>
> > > > > in
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > the README ?
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > --
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > Jarek Potiuk
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>
> >
>
> > > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > > --
>
> >
>
> > > > > Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> >
>
> > > > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > --
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Jarek Potiuk
>
> >
>
> > > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>
> >
>
> > > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> --
Sent from Gmail Mobile

Reply via email to