Thanks for the link. :) Okay, and there is also a differentiation between votes of PMC and votes of community members for lazy consensus votings? As of my understanding it doesn’t matter.
Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 08:50, Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> wrote: > That was a call for lazy consensus :) > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus > > Obviously, it was not silent this time :D > > J. > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:12 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: > >> "unless someone objects" -- so this isn't an official vote, we only care if >> someone objects :D >> >> -a >> >> On Fri, 4 Dec, 2020 at 21:41, Felix Uellendall <felue...@pm.me.INVALID> >> wrote: >> >>> Makes sense to me. I am actually curious how many people use the imap >>> provider? If anyone does please let me know - just wondering who else has >>> to process email attachments. 😅 >>> >>> +1 (if that’s is supposed to be an official voting - don’t see a voting >>> prefix in the email subject. Isn’t that required for official voting >>> threads?) >>> >>> Best, >>> Felix >>> >>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:13, Tomasz Urbaszek <tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:15 AM Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:41 PM James Timmins <ja...@astronomer.io> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:35 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:22 PM Arthur Wiedmer >>>>>>> <arthur.wied...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Following the discussion in >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12744 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would like to ask for a lazy consensus to get 4 providers installed >>>>>>>>> always when you install airflow: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> While they are separated out as providers (and can be downgraded or >>>>>>>>> upgraded independently, we will make them "required" dependencies,so >>>>>>>>> anyone who uses airflow using PIP will have those providers installed >>>>>>>>> by default: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * http >>>>>>>>> * ftp >>>>>>>>> * sqlite >>>>>>>>> * imap >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This will slightly increase the size of Airflow installation, because >>>>>>>>> none of them requires any additional dependencies, so no risk for >>>>>>>>> unnecessary conflict dependencies either, Since those are very >>>>>>>>> popular providers, we are pretty sure it is good to have them >>>>>>>>> installed by everyone and it will make it easier to migrate for >>>>>>>>> Airflow 1.10 users. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Unless someone objects until Monday 7th of December, 3:30 pm, we will >>>>>>>>> include those extras as defaults in the upcoming RC candidate of >>>>>>>>> Apache Airflow 2.0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> J. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jarek Potiuk >>>>>>>>> [Polidea](https://www.polidea.com/) | Principal Software Engineer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> M: [+48 660 796 129](tel:+48660796129) >>>>>>>>> [Polidea](https://www.polidea.com/) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Tomasz Urbaszek >>>> [Polidea](https://www.polidea.com/) | Software Engineer >>>> >>>> M: [+48 505 628 493](tel:+48505628493) >>>> E: [tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com](mailto:tomasz.urbasz...@polidea.com) >>>> >>>> Unique Tech >>>> Check out [our projects!](https://www.polidea.com/our-work) > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > [Polidea](https://www.polidea.com/) | Principal Software Engineer > > M: [+48 660 796 129](tel:+48660796129) > [Polidea](https://www.polidea.com/)
