Thanks for the link. :)

Okay, and there is also a differentiation between votes of PMC and votes of 
community members for lazy consensus votings? As of my understanding it doesn’t 
matter.

Felix

Sent from ProtonMail Mobile

On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 08:50, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:

> That was a call for lazy consensus :) 
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus
>
> Obviously, it was not silent this time :D
>
> J.
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:12 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> "unless someone objects" -- so this isn't an official vote, we only care if 
>> someone objects :D
>>
>> -a
>>
>> On Fri, 4 Dec, 2020 at 21:41, Felix Uellendall <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Makes sense to me. I am actually curious how many people use the imap 
>>> provider? If anyone does please let me know - just wondering who else has 
>>> to process email attachments. 😅
>>>
>>> +1 (if that’s is supposed to be an official voting - don’t see a voting 
>>> prefix in the email subject. Isn’t that required for official voting 
>>> threads?)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Felix
>>>
>>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:13, Tomasz Urbaszek <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:15 AM Vikram Koka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:41 PM James Timmins <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:35 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:22 PM Arthur Wiedmer 
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion in 
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12744
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would like to ask for a lazy consensus to get 4 providers installed 
>>>>>>>>> always when you install airflow:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> While they are separated out as providers (and can be downgraded or 
>>>>>>>>> upgraded independently, we will make them "required" dependencies,so 
>>>>>>>>> anyone who uses airflow using PIP will have those providers installed 
>>>>>>>>> by default:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * http
>>>>>>>>> * ftp
>>>>>>>>> * sqlite
>>>>>>>>> * imap
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This will slightly increase the size of Airflow installation, because 
>>>>>>>>> none of them requires any additional dependencies, so no risk for 
>>>>>>>>> unnecessary conflict dependencies either, Since those are very 
>>>>>>>>> popular providers, we are pretty sure it is good to have them 
>>>>>>>>> installed by everyone and it will make it easier to migrate for 
>>>>>>>>> Airflow 1.10 users.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unless someone objects until Monday 7th of December, 3:30 pm, we will 
>>>>>>>>> include those extras as defaults in the upcoming RC candidate of 
>>>>>>>>> Apache Airflow 2.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jarek Potiuk
>>>>>>>>> [Polidea](https://www.polidea.com/) | Principal Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> M: [+48 660 796 129](tel:+48660796129)
>>>>>>>>> [Polidea](https://www.polidea.com/)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Tomasz Urbaszek
>>>> [Polidea](https://www.polidea.com/) | Software Engineer
>>>>
>>>> M: [+48 505 628 493](tel:+48505628493)
>>>> E: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])
>>>>
>>>> Unique Tech
>>>> Check out [our projects!](https://www.polidea.com/our-work)
>
> --
>
> Jarek Potiuk
> [Polidea](https://www.polidea.com/) | Principal Software Engineer
>
> M: [+48 660 796 129](tel:+48660796129)
> [Polidea](https://www.polidea.com/)

Reply via email to