Does not matter IMHO :) On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 10:04 AM Felix Uellendall <felue...@pm.me.invalid> wrote:
> Thanks for the link. :) > > Okay, and there is also a differentiation between votes of PMC and votes > of community members for lazy consensus votings? As of my understanding it > doesn’t matter. > > Felix > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 08:50, Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> > wrote: > > That was a call for lazy consensus :) > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus > > Obviously, it was not silent this time :D > > J. > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:12 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: > >> "unless someone objects" -- so this isn't an official vote, we only care >> if someone objects :D >> >> >> -a >> >> On Fri, 4 Dec, 2020 at 21:41, Felix Uellendall <felue...@pm.me.INVALID> >> wrote: >> >> Makes sense to me. I am actually curious how many people use the imap >> provider? If anyone does please let me know - just wondering who else has >> to process email attachments. 😅 >> >> +1 (if that’s is supposed to be an official voting - don’t see a voting >> prefix in the email subject. Isn’t that required for official voting >> threads?) >> >> Best, >> Felix >> >> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:13, Tomasz Urbaszek < >> tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com> wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:15 AM Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:41 PM James Timmins <ja...@astronomer.io> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:35 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:22 PM Arthur Wiedmer < >>>>> arthur.wied...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Following the discussion in >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12744 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like to ask for a lazy consensus to get 4 providers >>>>>>> installed always when you install airflow: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While they are separated out as providers (and can be downgraded or >>>>>>> upgraded independently, we will make them "required" dependencies,so >>>>>>> anyone >>>>>>> who uses airflow using PIP will have those providers installed by >>>>>>> default: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * http >>>>>>> * ftp >>>>>>> * sqlite >>>>>>> * imap >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This will slightly increase the size of Airflow installation, >>>>>>> because none of them requires any additional dependencies, so no risk >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> unnecessary conflict dependencies either, Since those are very popular >>>>>>> providers, we are pretty sure it is good to have them installed by >>>>>>> everyone >>>>>>> and it will make it easier to migrate for Airflow 1.10 users. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Unless someone objects until Monday 7th of December, 3:30 pm, we >>>>>>> will include those extras as defaults in the upcoming RC candidate of >>>>>>> Apache Airflow 2.0. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> J. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jarek Potiuk >>>>>>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> >>>>>>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> -- >> >> Tomasz Urbaszek >> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Software Engineer >> >> M: +48 505 628 493 <+48505628493> >> E: tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com <tomasz.urbasz...@polidea.com> >> >> Unique Tech >> Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work> >> >> >> >> > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > > > > -- Jarek Potiuk Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
