Hello everyone,

Would be great to get some comments and reviews  - especially from
those who are users and are doing monitoring. Howard made a lot of
effort to show examples of how OTEL might help in this.

Otherwise, is the silence sign that all is good ?

J.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:53 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> And let me add to it - we laid some foundations for it with Melodie
> Ezeani - the Outreachy intern where we did some internal integration
> work that let us understand the challenges and state of
> open-telemetry.
>
> I am super excited about what open-telemetry can bring to Airflow -
> both short term (in metrics and instrumentation) and longer term - in
> logging when logging is mature enough.
>
> The open-telemetry mov is at the heart of the principles we have -
> making Airflow "modern" but at the same time delegating what's not
> "core" to those who can do it better. Open Telemetry is precisely
> about that,
>
> Howard particularly brought a great experience from using Open
> Telemetry before and making some good judgements and POC on the
> metrics produced by Airflow and how they can be useful from the
> "maintainer value" side. I looked at it from the technical integration
> POV - and Melodie helped to validate some of the assumptions and
> expose some of the technical challenges.
> The composite result is good, but we are looking with Howard on some
> insightful comments and critique - especially from the users of
> Airflow!
>
> I look forward to more cool stuff on Airflow!
>
> J.
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:39 PM Howard Yoo <howard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am pleased to announce the start of the discussion for the new AIP draft 
> > that was recently been published: 
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
> >
> > Jarek Potuik and I have been discussing about this proposal since early 
> > this year. During that time, we worked together on drafting this proposal, 
> > as well as doing another round of mini-POC to refresh and test on 
> > feasibility of OpenTelemetry on Apache Airflow.
> >
> > As the POC was successful in terms of testing the OpenTelemetry on Airflow, 
> > we would like to expand the discussion to a wider user community here this 
> > mailing list to gather more consensus, comments, and feedbacks regarding 
> > this AIP.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Howard and Jarek

Reply via email to