Or maybe that people are so stunned by the beauty and usefulness of it that they cannot even say a word :)
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:37 PM Howard Yoo <howard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it may mean all is well, perhaps :-) > Howard > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:29 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> Would be great to get some comments and reviews - especially from >> those who are users and are doing monitoring. Howard made a lot of >> effort to show examples of how OTEL might help in this. >> >> Otherwise, is the silence sign that all is good ? >> >> J. >> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:53 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: >> > >> > And let me add to it - we laid some foundations for it with Melodie >> > Ezeani - the Outreachy intern where we did some internal integration >> > work that let us understand the challenges and state of >> > open-telemetry. >> > >> > I am super excited about what open-telemetry can bring to Airflow - >> > both short term (in metrics and instrumentation) and longer term - in >> > logging when logging is mature enough. >> > >> > The open-telemetry mov is at the heart of the principles we have - >> > making Airflow "modern" but at the same time delegating what's not >> > "core" to those who can do it better. Open Telemetry is precisely >> > about that, >> > >> > Howard particularly brought a great experience from using Open >> > Telemetry before and making some good judgements and POC on the >> > metrics produced by Airflow and how they can be useful from the >> > "maintainer value" side. I looked at it from the technical integration >> > POV - and Melodie helped to validate some of the assumptions and >> > expose some of the technical challenges. >> > The composite result is good, but we are looking with Howard on some >> > insightful comments and critique - especially from the users of >> > Airflow! >> > >> > I look forward to more cool stuff on Airflow! >> > >> > J. >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:39 PM Howard Yoo <howard...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > I am pleased to announce the start of the discussion for the new AIP >> > > draft that was recently been published: >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow >> > > >> > > Jarek Potuik and I have been discussing about this proposal since early >> > > this year. During that time, we worked together on drafting this >> > > proposal, as well as doing another round of mini-POC to refresh and test >> > > on feasibility of OpenTelemetry on Apache Airflow. >> > > >> > > As the POC was successful in terms of testing the OpenTelemetry on >> > > Airflow, we would like to expand the discussion to a wider user >> > > community here this mailing list to gather more consensus, comments, and >> > > feedbacks regarding this AIP. >> > > >> > > Sincerely, >> > > Howard and Jarek
