mohammadirfanmemon687...@gmail.com On Sep 19, 2023 10:19 AM, "Daniel Standish" <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> I was able to chat with a couple folks about this. Small sample, but the > sentiment was, "this is just a timeout". In other words, if we're going to > call this SLA, we really ought to evaluate against the "this thing should > have run by" time and not the actual start time. And, ideally, we should > also have a way to enforce "this should have run by X time daily" (for > example) even when it's a dataset-triggered or API-triggered dag with *no* > schedule. > > Like I said, it's a small number of folks I've talked to, so I don't have > overwhelming confidence about this assessment. But I do think it's more > likely than not that this would be the prevailing assessment were somehow > able to get better data on this. >
