Agree with Andrey's suggestions - added a few of mine directly to the docs as comments/suggestions. Summary of my comments:
* mentioning 2.5 providers compatibility and reasoning why people staying below 2.5 * I thing suggesting list of services/tools Airflow might interact with to choose, will introduce bias and will make it difficult to get "real" impression on what is used. I suggest leaving it "freeform". * asking questions about importance/ways how they are managing security of their deployment (and whether they follow advisories) * I think we should also ask question about "other" orchestration tools and what made people choose airflow/consider others On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 6:58 PM Andrey Anshin <andrey.ans...@taragol.is> wrote: > Hey Briana, > > Thanks for sharing questions. Let me share some idea/improvements, but it > only my thoughts so it could be non-relevant for create clear survey > > *Which version of Airflow do you currently use* > Maybe it's better keep only this one? > - 1.10 > - <=2.4 > - 2.5 > - 2.6 > - 2.7 > > 1.10 it is so legacy now > 2-2.4 not so legacy, but latest providers can't be install on this versions > 2.5.x it is the highest version which might install latest providers > > *Which Metadata Database do you use?* > > My suggestion is to make this question, if it possible, only for > self-hosted Airflow installation. I guess for Managed Airflow it would > always be Postgres. > > An split this question by two different > > First about type of DB > > - MySQL (not MariaDB) > - Postgres > - Microsoft SQL Server > - Other: ______ > > Second one about version DB version > > - Version: ______ > - I don't know > > Every year new version of Postgres released, so if we consider that some > users might still use 1.10.x then it could be a chance 9.4 - 9.5 used > I think more interesting in this question is Postgres have critical total > share value (like 80-90 of all respondent) from which we might start think, > is actually we need in the future (Airflow 3.x/4.x) something different > rather than Postgres and SQLite (for testing) > > > > ---- > Best Wishes > *Andrey Anshin* > > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 19:08, Briana Okyere > <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > Hey All, > > > > For the last few years, we've sent out surveys to get a sense of the > state > > of this Airflow community, and this year I've been tasked with > distributing > > it. I'd love to get your feedback before it's pushed live. > > > > I've made some minor tweaks to the 2022 survey and added the questions to > > this google doc: < > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FbluXNGq9cI3N9zw1cH4F4cEQfyIQ6tk7tGLo4ZN4AE/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > > Is there anything you think should be added or removed? > > > > Please note- it is useful to compare data from previous years to this > year, > > so I believe the majority of the questions should remain similar-ish. > > However, there is always room for improvement! > > > > Here are last year's results for reference: > > <https://airflow.apache.org/blog/airflow-survey-2022/> > > > > Also, if anyone is interested in helping with analysis after the results > > are in, please let me know. > > > > -- > > Briana Okyere > > Community Manager > > Email: briana.oky...@astronomer.io > > <john....@astronomer.io>Mobile: +1 415.713.9943 > > Time zone: US Pacific UTC > > > > <https://www.astronomer.io/> > > >
