Awesome! Will follow up with you both after the results are in. That will take a few weeks :)
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 1:13 PM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> wrote: > Count me in to analyze the results as well, Briana. > > Thanks & Best Regards, > Amogh Desai > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2023, 00:12 Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ooh, sounds fun. Count me in! > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Aritra Basu > > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023, 10:05 PM Briana Okyere > > <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Glad to hear it, Aritra! It means reviewing and helping us present the > > > results to the larger community in a valuable way. > > > > > > EG here is how we did last year's: > > > <https://airflow.apache.org/blog/airflow-survey-2022/> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:08 AM Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Briana, > > > > What does analysing the results entail? Sounds intriguing, I'd be > > > > interested to help. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Aritra Basu > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023, 9:03 PM Briana Okyere > > > > <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey All, > > > > > > > > > > Thank you so much for this feedback- I reviewed all of your notes > > > > yesterday > > > > > with a few other folks and we were able to implement many of your > > > > > suggestions to make this thing even better than last year's. > > > > > > > > > > I will be closing feedback now so we can move forward with getting > > this > > > > > thing out there, and will post it to the devlist so you can check > it > > > out > > > > > and hopefully complete it! > > > > > > > > > > If anyone is interested in helping to analyze the results, please > let > > > me > > > > > know- and thank you again! > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 6:37 PM Mehta, Shubham > > > <shu...@amazon.com.invalid > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Briana, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for putting this together. It's looking pretty good for > > the > > > > > > first draft. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have added quite a few comments and left some suggestions for > > > > changes. > > > > > A > > > > > > few important things to call out here: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. We should work backwards from what our goals are with this > > survey > > > > and > > > > > > how we want this to inform us, removing any questions that don't > > help > > > > us > > > > > in > > > > > > forming any opinion. For instance, the question "How many people > at > > > > your > > > > > > company directly work on data?" probably won’t inform us about > > > > anything. > > > > > > Instead, asking "YOE with Airflow" would help us understand new > > user > > > > > > preferences versus pro user preferences. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. In the demographics section, it would be beneficial to > ascertain > > > > > > whether the respondent only uses Airflow or contributes to it as > > > well. > > > > > This > > > > > > way, we can completely hide the section about contribution and > vice > > > > > versa. > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Some of the options are quite descriptive. Let’s aim to reduce > > the > > > > > time > > > > > > to finish the survey as much as possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Can you please indicate which questions should have > > single-choice > > > > > > answers and which should have multiple-choice answers? Last year, > > > there > > > > > > were some questions that should have been multiple choice, but > were > > > > > > formatted as single choice, resulting in mixed responses. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Shubham > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2023-10-25, 12:35 PM, "Jarek Potiuk" <ja...@potiuk.com > > <mailto: > > > > > > ja...@potiuk.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. > Do > > > not > > > > > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender > > and > > > > > know > > > > > > the content is safe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur > > > > externe. > > > > > > Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous > > ne > > > > > pouvez > > > > > > pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas > > > certain > > > > > que > > > > > > le contenu ne présente aucun risque. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agree with Andrey's suggestions - added a few of mine directly to > > the > > > > > docs > > > > > > as comments/suggestions. Summary of my comments: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * mentioning 2.5 providers compatibility and reasoning why people > > > > staying > > > > > > below 2.5 > > > > > > * I thing suggesting list of services/tools Airflow might > interact > > > with > > > > > to > > > > > > choose, will introduce bias and will make it difficult to get > > "real" > > > > > > impression on what is used. I suggest leaving it "freeform". > > > > > > * asking questions about importance/ways how they are managing > > > security > > > > > of > > > > > > their deployment (and whether they follow advisories) > > > > > > * I think we should also ask question about "other" orchestration > > > tools > > > > > and > > > > > > what made people choose airflow/consider others > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 6:58 PM Andrey Anshin < > > > > andrey.ans...@taragol.is > > > > > > <mailto:andrey.ans...@taragol.is>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Briana, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for sharing questions. Let me share some > > idea/improvements, > > > > but > > > > > it > > > > > > > only my thoughts so it could be non-relevant for create clear > > > survey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Which version of Airflow do you currently use* > > > > > > > Maybe it's better keep only this one? > > > > > > > - 1.10 > > > > > > > - <=2.4 > > > > > > > - 2.5 > > > > > > > - 2.6 > > > > > > > - 2.7 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.10 it is so legacy now > > > > > > > 2-2.4 not so legacy, but latest providers can't be install on > > this > > > > > > versions > > > > > > > 2.5.x it is the highest version which might install latest > > > providers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Which Metadata Database do you use?* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My suggestion is to make this question, if it possible, only > for > > > > > > > self-hosted Airflow installation. I guess for Managed Airflow > it > > > > would > > > > > > > always be Postgres. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An split this question by two different > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First about type of DB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - MySQL (not MariaDB) > > > > > > > - Postgres > > > > > > > - Microsoft SQL Server > > > > > > > - Other: ______ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Second one about version DB version > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Version: ______ > > > > > > > - I don't know > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Every year new version of Postgres released, so if we consider > > that > > > > > some > > > > > > > users might still use 1.10.x then it could be a chance 9.4 - > 9.5 > > > used > > > > > > > I think more interesting in this question is Postgres have > > critical > > > > > total > > > > > > > share value (like 80-90 of all respondent) from which we might > > > start > > > > > > think, > > > > > > > is actually we need in the future (Airflow 3.x/4.x) something > > > > different > > > > > > > rather than Postgres and SQLite (for testing) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > Best Wishes > > > > > > > *Andrey Anshin* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 19:08, Briana Okyere > > > > > > > <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.inva <mailto: > > > > > > briana.oky...@astronomer.io.inva>lid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the last few years, we've sent out surveys to get a sense > > of > > > > the > > > > > > > state > > > > > > > > of this Airflow community, and this year I've been tasked > with > > > > > > > distributing > > > > > > > > it. I'd love to get your feedback before it's pushed live. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've made some minor tweaks to the 2022 survey and added the > > > > > questions > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > this google doc: < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FbluXNGq9cI3N9zw1cH4F4cEQfyIQ6tk7tGLo4ZN4AE/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FbluXNGq9cI3N9zw1cH4F4cEQfyIQ6tk7tGLo4ZN4AE/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anything you think should be added or removed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note- it is useful to compare data from previous years > > to > > > > this > > > > > > > year, > > > > > > > > so I believe the majority of the questions should remain > > > > similar-ish. > > > > > > > > However, there is always room for improvement! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here are last year's results for reference: > > > > > > > > <https://airflow.apache.org/blog/airflow-survey-2022/> < > > > > > > https://airflow.apache.org/blog/airflow-survey-2022/>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, if anyone is interested in helping with analysis after > > the > > > > > > results > > > > > > > > are in, please let me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Briana Okyere > > > > > > > > Community Manager > > > > > > > > Email: briana.oky...@astronomer.io <mailto: > > > > > briana.oky...@astronomer.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <john....@astronomer.io <mailto:john....@astronomer.io > > >>Mobile: > > > +1 > > > > > > 415.713.9943 > > > > > > > > Time zone: US Pacific UTC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://www.astronomer.io/> <https://www.astronomer.io/> > ;> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
