On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you explain again what's wrong with create ? I think I missed > it...
You can't pass in a subclass of the type returned by the createXYZ method as the object creation happens inside the task. If you want to use a subclass of Path named mypath, you can't use it in tasks that use createPath for the nested <path> element. > My understanding was that whatever is in use today will continue to > work the same, we just add a new pattern at the end. Yes, with the caveat that polymorphism doesn't work for the createXYZ case. Stefan
