Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We are still left the problem of the Type create<Name>() pattern. > > I don't think that it was solvable. Almost any soltion world require > cooperation of the classes implementing the create method. > > What we can do is adapting all core classes that use the createPattern > to also provide the add pattern (with modifications along the lines > you suggest) - and make IntrospectionHelper favor addXYZ over > createXYZ just as it setXYZ(SomeType) over setXYZ(String) now.
Can you explain again what's wrong with create ? I think I missed it... My understanding was that whatever is in use today will continue to work the same, we just add a new pattern at the end. Costin
