On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-11-19, Bruce Atherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The only other topic I saw brought up on this thread was whether a
>> target-group should be allowed to have tasks in it rather than
>> requiring it to be empty.
>
> If we allwed them to e non-empty, we could do away with target-group
> completely and simply open up the depends list of all targets.

Sorry, I'm not getting this. Can you expand on what you mean please? --DD

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to