On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > target-group is-a target. A "plain target" is a target as opposed to > a target-group.
Since I have conceptualized them in my head as something different than targets, I forget that implementation-wise they remain targets. I actually think it would be better if the code made them distinct classes, possibly extracting an interface for the perform and dependency getting parts, but that's a different story. From the user and documentation perspective, the fact that a target-group is a target under the cover should be de-emphasized IMHO. --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
