Aaron Bannert wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11:15:48AM -0700, Brian Pane wrote: > > I think APR is close to being ready for 1.0. We still need to > > fix the apr_time_t performance problems (the old 64-bit division > > issue), though. > > Can we plan on doing this for 1.1 once we have the versioning in > place and a solid release? >
As long as we remain transparent. If not, then we should do it right in 1.0 (IMO). -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
