On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > > My main concern is that if we go down that path now then it may be a > > long time before we become stable again, and it will take time for our > > dependent projects to sync up too. It seems that we are at a point that > > we could call stable now, and if we want to redo the time interfaces > > at some later date we can do so on our own schedule, and call it 1.1 > > or 2.0 depending on what it takes to change it and how it fits with our > > versioning rules. > > > > I'm OK with that. I'd like to propose that we wait at least until Bill > Rowe comes back from vacation until we make any full/final decision.
Why are we waiting for Bill to come back? I thought the whole point of OSS was that no one person was so important that we couldn't continue without them? Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Jean St Oakland CA 94610 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
