Aaron Bannert wrote: > > My main concern is that if we go down that path now then it may be a > long time before we become stable again, and it will take time for our > dependent projects to sync up too. It seems that we are at a point that > we could call stable now, and if we want to redo the time interfaces > at some later date we can do so on our own schedule, and call it 1.1 > or 2.0 depending on what it takes to change it and how it fits with our > versioning rules. >
I'm OK with that. I'd like to propose that we wait at least until Bill Rowe comes back from vacation until we make any full/final decision. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
