On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:55 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. > <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> APR_HA... excellent! If you can add these other symbols at your leisure, >> it is good for documentation purposes, even if they have been mismatched >> for a while. This mingw/msys build should be good to keep them in sync >> and observe any quirks/differences more regularly! My old method was to >> ./configure linux and then take a stab at figuring out which was which, >> and resorting to try to get them aligned. But dozens of configure.in and >> build/*.m4 patches later, they are going to fall out of alignment again. > > I'll see what else I can tweak. After the last commits the main HAVE/HAS differences between apr.hw and my MinGW builds of trunk are Only in apr.h: APR_HAVE_DIRENT_H=1 APR_HAVE_INET_NETWORK=1 APR_HAVE_SEMAPHORE_H=1 APR_HAVE_STDINT_H=1 APR_HAVE_STRCASECMP=1 APR_HAVE_STRINGS_H=1 APR_HAVE_STRNCASECMP=1 APR_HAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 APR_HAVE_UNISTD_H=1 Only in apr.hw: APR_HAVE_DIRENT_H=0 APR_HAVE_INET_NETWORK=0 APR_HAVE_SEMAPHORE_H=0 APR_HAVE_STDINT_H=0 APR_HAVE_STRCASECMP=0 APR_HAVE_STRINGS_H=0 APR_HAVE_STRNCASECMP=0 APR_HAVE_SYS_TIME_H=0 APR_HAVE_UNISTD_H=0 (omitting build-time choices ICONV/IPV6) No claim here that anything needs to be done about it...
