Thanks everyone for participating in this vote. As there is no vote down, I will continue the work of merging Beam ZetaSQL in Beam repo.
-Rui On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:20 AM Rui Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Although it would be a long way to go, I also hope it can go into Calcite. > > > -Rui > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:11 AM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:09 AM Andrew Pilloud <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> I also hope this can move to Calcite. >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:40 AM Gleb Kanterov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> Wishing that this goes to calcite too someday (hoping that it makes >>>>> Beam side maintenance simpler) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:18 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > +1 >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Mingmin Xu <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> +1 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> +1 >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Community, >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on >>>>> contributing Beam ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by >>>>> BeamSQL) to Beam repo. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design >>>>> and others on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. >>>>> Note >>>>> that this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by >>>>> code >>>>> review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam >>>>> repo. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL >>>>> >>>>>>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please >>>>> discuss it in [1]. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> [1]: >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>>>> >>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> -Rui >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received >>>>> this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, >>>>> please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it >>>>> has >>>>> gone to the wrong person. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are >>>>> provided solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to >>>>> be and do not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding >>>>> obligations will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in >>>>> final form is executed in writing by all parties involved. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -- >>>>> >> ---- >>>>> >> Mingmin >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cheers, >>>> Gleb >>>> >>>
