+1 On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Community, >>>> >>>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam >>>> ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam >>>> repo. >>>> >>>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others >>>> on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that this >>>> vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code review. >>>> This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. >>>> >>>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL >>>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL >>>> >>>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it >>>> in [1]. >>>> >>>> [1]: >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 >>>> >>>> -Rui >>>> >>> > > -- > > This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this > communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please > erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone > to the wrong person. > > The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are provided > solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to be and do > not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding obligations > will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in final form is > executed in writing by all parties involved. >
