+1

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang <ruw...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Community,
>>>
>>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam
>>> ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam
>>> repo.
>>>
>>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others
>>> on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that this
>>> vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code review.
>>> This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo.
>>>
>>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL
>>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL
>>>
>>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it
>>> in [1].
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210
>>>
>>> -Rui
>>>
>>

-- 

This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this
communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please
erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone
to the wrong person.

The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are provided
solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to be and do
not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding obligations
will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in final form is
executed in writing by all parties involved.

Reply via email to