+1
I also hope this can move to Calcite.

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:40 AM Gleb Kanterov <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Wishing that this goes to calcite too someday (hoping that it makes
>> Beam side maintenance simpler)
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:18 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Mingmin Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> +1
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> +1
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi Community,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing
>> Beam ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to
>> Beam repo.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and
>> others on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note
>> that this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code
>> review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL
>> >>>>>>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please
>> discuss it in [1].
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> [1]:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> >>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> -Rui
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this
>> communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please
>> erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone
>> to the wrong person.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are
>> provided solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to
>> be and do not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding
>> obligations will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in
>> final form is executed in writing by all parties involved.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> ----
>> >> Mingmin
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Gleb
>

Reply via email to