+1 On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell <ryanmcdow...@google.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni <r...@google.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang <ruw...@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Community, >>>>> >>>>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam >>>>> ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam >>>>> repo. >>>>> >>>>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others >>>>> on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that this >>>>> vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code review. >>>>> This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. >>>>> >>>>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL >>>>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL >>>>> >>>>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it >>>>> in [1]. >>>>> >>>>> [1]: >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 >>>>> >>>>> -Rui >>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> >> This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this >> communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please >> erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone >> to the wrong person. >> >> The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are provided >> solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to be and do >> not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding obligations >> will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in final form is >> executed in writing by all parties involved. >> > -- ---- Mingmin
