> Also I wonder if we now need to clarify both Java 8 and Java 11 versions > separately?
You mean for the docker images? Otherwise we should not be using Java 11 at all to produce the artifacts. On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 4:51 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <[email protected]> wrote: > > Noting that announcement does not include the version of the Java compilers > used - looks like the release guide still requires it: > > * Java artifacts were built with Maven MAVEN_VERSION and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK > JDK_VERSION. > > > Could you please add this info to this thread for posterity? > > Also I wonder if we now need to clarify both Java 8 and Java 11 versions > separately? > > Other than that, +1 from me. Ran several mobile gaming pipelines on Direct > and Dataflow runners with Python 3.8. > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:49 AM Jan Lukavský <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding). >> >> I've validated the RC against my dependent projects (mainly Java SDK, Flink >> and DirectRunner). >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jan >> >> On 1/7/21 2:15 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) - validated python quickstarts. >> >> Thank you Pablo. >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:57 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> I've built and unit tested existing Dataflow Templates with the new version. >>> Best >>> -P. >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:17 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for the version 2.27.0, >>>> as follows: >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>>> >>>> NOTE. What happened to RC #2? I started building RC2 before completing all >>>> the cherry-picks, so the tag for RC2 was created on an incorrect commit. >>>> >>>> NOTE. What happened to RC #3? I started building RC3, but a new bug was >>>> discovered (BEAM-11569) that required amending the branch. Thus this is >>>> now RC4. >>>> >>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release >>>> candidate, and vote +1 >>>> if no issues are found. >>>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: >>>> * JIRA release notes [1], >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org >>>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint >>>> C79DDD47DAF3808F0B9DDFAC02B2D9F742008494 [3], >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4], >>>> * source code tag "v2.27.0-RC4" [5], >>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API >>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8]. >>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the >>>> dist.apache.org [2]. >>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.27.0 release to help with validation >>>> [9]. >>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10]. >>>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, but given the holidays, we >>>> will likely extend for a few more days. The release will be adopted by >>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -P. >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349380 >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.27.0/ >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1149/ >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.27.0-RC4 >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13602 >>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/610 >>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13603 >>>> [9] >>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=194829106 >>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
