+1, I verified the python mobile game walkthrough on core runners.

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:29 AM Valentyn Tymofieiev <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:06 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > Also I wonder if we now need to clarify both Java 8 and Java 11
>> versions separately?
>>
>> You mean for the docker images? Otherwise we should not be using Java
>> 11 at all to produce the artifacts.
>>
>
> Thanks for clarification, yes, looks like Docker images are the only
> artifacts where this concern applies.  The Docker images include several
> jars[1], that I believe are currently built locally (by a release manager
> at container image build time). Are the jars included in Java 11 images
> built with Java 11? If so, is it worth calling out the compiler?  Also,
> perhaps we should look into building release artifacts using Jenkins or
> Github Actions, with a preconfigured version of compilers, instead of
> whatever version is installed on the release manager's machine.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/sdks/java/container/Dockerfile#L24-L33
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 4:51 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Noting that announcement does not include the version of the Java
>> compilers used - looks like the release guide still requires it:
>> >
>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven MAVEN_VERSION and OpenJDK/Oracle
>> JDK JDK_VERSION.
>> >
>> >
>> > Could you please add this info to this thread for posterity?
>> >
>> > Also I wonder if we now need to clarify both Java 8 and Java 11
>> versions separately?
>> >
>> > Other than that, +1 from me. Ran several mobile gaming pipelines on
>> Direct and Dataflow runners with Python 3.8.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:49 AM Jan Lukavský <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 (non-binding).
>> >>
>> >> I've validated the RC against my dependent projects (mainly Java SDK,
>> Flink and DirectRunner).
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >>  Jan
>> >>
>> >> On 1/7/21 2:15 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 (binding) - validated python quickstarts.
>> >>
>> >> Thank you Pablo.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:57 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 (binding)
>> >>> I've built and unit tested existing Dataflow Templates with the new
>> version.
>> >>> Best
>> >>> -P.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:17 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for the version
>> 2.27.0, as follows:
>> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> NOTE. What happened to RC #2? I started building RC2 before
>> completing all the cherry-picks, so the tag for RC2 was created on an
>> incorrect commit.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> NOTE. What happened to RC #3? I started building RC3, but a new bug
>> was discovered (BEAM-11569) that required amending the branch. Thus this is
>> now RC4.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
>> release candidate, and vote +1
>> >>>>  if no issues are found.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> includes:
>> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>> C79DDD47DAF3808F0B9DDFAC02B2D9F742008494 [3],
>> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> >>>> * source code tag "v2.27.0-RC4" [5],
>> >>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>> >>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>> dist.apache.org [2].
>> >>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.27.0 release to help with
>> validation [9].
>> >>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, but given the holidays,
>> we will likely extend for a few more days. The release will be adopted by
>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> -P.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349380
>> >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.27.0/
>> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> >>>> [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1149/
>> >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.27.0-RC4
>> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13602
>> >>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/610
>> >>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13603
>> >>>> [9]
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=194829106
>> >>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>
>

Reply via email to