Hi all, I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 8 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: * Pablo Estrada * Ahmet Altay * JB Onofre There are no disapproving votes. Thanks everyone! I'll finalize the release over the next few hours. Best -P. On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:59 PM Brian Hulette <bhule...@google.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested Python DataFrame pipeline and sql_taxi example (multi-language, > streaming) on Dataflow. > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:35 PM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding). >> >> Tested Java quickstart for Direct/Dataflow runners and multi-language >> pipelines. >> >> Thanks, >> Cham >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:47 AM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Valentyn, >>> these were built using Maven 3.6.0, and OpenJDK version 1.8.0_232. >>> Best >>> -P. >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:45 AM Yichi Zhang <zyi...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1, I verified the python mobile game walkthrough on core runners. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:29 AM Valentyn Tymofieiev <valen...@google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:06 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> > Also I wonder if we now need to clarify both Java 8 and Java 11 >>>>>> versions separately? >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean for the docker images? Otherwise we should not be using Java >>>>>> 11 at all to produce the artifacts. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for clarification, yes, looks like Docker images are the only >>>>> artifacts where this concern applies. The Docker images include several >>>>> jars[1], that I believe are currently built locally (by a release manager >>>>> at container image build time). Are the jars included in Java 11 images >>>>> built with Java 11? If so, is it worth calling out the compiler? Also, >>>>> perhaps we should look into building release artifacts using Jenkins or >>>>> Github Actions, with a preconfigured version of compilers, instead of >>>>> whatever version is installed on the release manager's machine. >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/sdks/java/container/Dockerfile#L24-L33 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 4:51 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev < >>>>>> valen...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Noting that announcement does not include the version of the Java >>>>>> compilers used - looks like the release guide still requires it: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven MAVEN_VERSION and >>>>>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK JDK_VERSION. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Could you please add this info to this thread for posterity? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Also I wonder if we now need to clarify both Java 8 and Java 11 >>>>>> versions separately? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Other than that, +1 from me. Ran several mobile gaming pipelines on >>>>>> Direct and Dataflow runners with Python 3.8. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:49 AM Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> +1 (non-binding). >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I've validated the RC against my dependent projects (mainly Java >>>>>> SDK, Flink and DirectRunner). >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Thanks, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Jan >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On 1/7/21 2:15 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> +1 (binding) - validated python quickstarts. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Thank you Pablo. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:57 PM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>> I've built and unit tested existing Dataflow Templates with the >>>>>> new version. >>>>>> >>> Best >>>>>> >>> -P. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:17 PM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for the >>>>>> version 2.27.0, as follows: >>>>>> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >>>>>> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific >>>>>> comments) >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> NOTE. What happened to RC #2? I started building RC2 before >>>>>> completing all the cherry-picks, so the tag for RC2 was created on an >>>>>> incorrect commit. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> NOTE. What happened to RC #3? I started building RC3, but a new >>>>>> bug was discovered (BEAM-11569) that required amending the branch. Thus >>>>>> this is now RC4. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the >>>>>> release candidate, and vote +1 >>>>>> >>>> if no issues are found. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which >>>>>> includes: >>>>>> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1], >>>>>> >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to >>>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint >>>>>> C79DDD47DAF3808F0B9DDFAC02B2D9F742008494 [3], >>>>>> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository >>>>>> [4], >>>>>> >>>> * source code tag "v2.27.0-RC4" [5], >>>>>> >>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the >>>>>> API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8]. >>>>>> >>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to >>>>>> the dist.apache.org [2]. >>>>>> >>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.27.0 release to help with >>>>>> validation [9]. >>>>>> >>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10]. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, but given the >>>>>> holidays, we will likely extend for a few more days. The release will be >>>>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>> -P. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> [1] >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349380 >>>>>> >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.27.0/ >>>>>> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >>>>>> >>>> [4] >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1149/ >>>>>> >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.27.0-RC4 >>>>>> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13602 >>>>>> >>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/610 >>>>>> >>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13603 >>>>>> >>>> [9] >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=194829106 >>>>>> >>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image >>>>>> >>>>>
