+1 (non-binding) I ran the java local quickstarts and verified the nexmark tests.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:50 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kenn, > > There is a version mismatch between Beam version and Dataflow Python > worker version (the latter currently has version 2.28.0.dev), you can fix > the Dataflow containers themselves without rebuilding the RC. > > Also Dataflow containers for Python 3.6 do not include 'dataclasses' - a > Beam's dependency, which will cause Dataflow jobs to fail in an environment > without internet. > > Thanks, > Valentyn > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:06 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> I built and ran basic tests with existing Dataflow Templates. >> Best >> -P. >> >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:42 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 4:02 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: >>> > * JIRA release notes [1], >>> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org >>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint >>> 03DBA3E6ABDD04BFD1558DC16ED551A8AE02461C [3], >>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4], >>> > * source code tag "v2.29.0-RC1" [5], >>> > * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API >>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8]. >>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven MAVEN_VERSION and >>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK JDK_VERSION. >>> >>> Are the MAVEN_VERSION and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK JDK_VERSION supposed to >>> be filled in with numbers? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Elliotte Rusty Harold >>> [email protected] >>> >>
