On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Leonard Mada wrote:
>
> I strongly suggest moving this page to a new location, something like:
>
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bibliographic_Project/Plugins/Zote
>ro instead of creating such orphaned pages.
Leonard,
Thanks for the the suggestion. When I started the wiki pages I just
copied
what most other people were doing - which was a flat file structure with any
hierarchy built using category links.
I can see there advantages in moving to a hierarchical directory organisation.
Are there any objections to my restructuring the wiki pages in this way ?
regards
David
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Leonard Mada wrote:
>
> All bibliographic wiki-pages should be ultimately moved below the
> top-level page 'Bibliographic_Project'.
>
> I hope nobody gets annoyed by this quibbling about the wiki-structure.
> As you know, I am rather focused on the hierarchical organisation of
> data (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bib-Keywords), and this
> makes sense. It becomes much easier to navigate such sites, see e.g.
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/ToDo/Layout/Multi_Page_Layo
>ut where one easily can navigate back to the top-level Writer page.
> [http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer]
>
> I hope therefore, that all project leads will enforce this style and
> improve existing wikis by moving orphaned pages below the top-level
> project's wiki-page.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Leonard
>
> > regards
> >
> > David
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-------------------
David N. Wilson
Co-Project Lead for the Bibliographic
OpenOffice.org Project
http://bibliographic.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
