I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work.  If others have a different opinion 
on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA.  I want to make sure we have 
the backing of the community on this.


- Bobby

On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans 
<ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a try.  Like I 
said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways.  Our code is based 
off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see what differences 
there are with the API.

- Bobby

On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli 
<eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects and I 
am very +1 on the switch
to Netty 4

@Sijie what do you think ?
If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x)  who can take care of
the first port ?


Enrico

2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:

> I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later.  Simply
> because we have been running with it for quite a while in production so we
> know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other patches
> we want to push back.  Meaning we only have a handful of patches to push
> back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not
> impossible for other patches.  If we do want to wait until 4.6.x for netty4
> then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can start
> to move forward with netty4 on master.  I realize that a change this big is
> going to add more work to others too so I am open to other opinions.
>
>
> - Bobby
>
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers,
> At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is some
> work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native
> OpenSSL + netty 4.
>
> How the work is going ?
>
> Open questions are:
>
> 1) status of my current patch on SSL
>
> should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it
> or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
>
> 2) switch to Netty 4:
> Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from
> Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x.
>
> What are your current thoughts ?
>
> -- Enrico
>

Reply via email to