Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday. tomorrow 8 AM PST. Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote: > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week. > > > - Bobby > > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or on > Friday? > > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting. > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < > > jujj...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond? > > > > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> It depends on the "host". > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use the > > >> room > > >> linked at > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > Community+Meetings > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter) > > >> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend. > > >> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the > > meeting > > >> ? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>: > > >> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join > the > > >> right > > >> > one this time. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > - Bobby > > >> > > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < > > >> > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Great! > > >> > > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Enrico > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < > jujj...@gmail.com > > >: > > >> > > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's > patch. > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore > has > > >> takes > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7. > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans > > >> <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid > > >> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a > > >> different > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I > want > > to > > >> > make > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > - Bobby > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give > it a > > >> try. > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. > > >> Our > > >> > > code > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and > > see > > >> > what > > >> > > > differences there are with the API. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > - Bobby > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico > Olivelli < > > >> > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my > > >> > projects > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch > > >> > > > to Netty 4 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ? > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can > take > > >> care > > >> > of > > >> > > > the first port ? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Enrico > > >> > > > > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid > > >> >: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. > > >> > Simply > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in > > >> production > > >> > so > > >> > > > we > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of > > >> other > > >> > > > patches > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of > patches > > >> to > > >> > > push > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult > if > > >> not > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until > 4.6.x > > >> for > > >> > > > netty4 > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so > we > > >> can > > >> > > start > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a > change > > >> this > > >> > > big > > >> > > > is > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other > > >> opinions. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > - Bobby > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico > > Olivelli < > > >> > > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers, > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce > > there > > >> is > > >> > > some > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances > using > > >> > native > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > How the work is going ? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Open questions are: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work > > >> from > > >> > it > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4: > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and > now > > >> from > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > -- Enrico > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Jvrao > > >> > > --- > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight > you, > > >> then > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jvrao > > > --- > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, > then > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jvrao > > --- > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > > > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > -- Jvrao --- First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
