I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week.
- Bobby On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or on Friday? Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting. > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < > jujj...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond? > > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> It depends on the "host". > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use the > >> room > >> linked at > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Community+Meetings > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter) > >> > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend. > >> > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the > meeting > >> ? > >> > >> > >> > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>: > >> > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join the > >> right > >> > one this time. > >> > > >> > > >> > - Bobby > >> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < > >> > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Great! > >> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes > >> > > >> > > >> > Enrico > >> > > >> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com > >: > >> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch. > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has > >> takes > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7. > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans > >> <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a > >> different > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want > to > >> > make > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > - Bobby > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a > >> try. > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. > >> Our > >> > > code > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and > see > >> > what > >> > > > differences there are with the API. > >> > > > > >> > > > - Bobby > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < > >> > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my > >> > projects > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch > >> > > > to Netty 4 > >> > > > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ? > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take > >> care > >> > of > >> > > > the first port ? > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Enrico > >> > > > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid > >> >: > >> > > > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. > >> > Simply > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in > >> production > >> > so > >> > > > we > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of > >> other > >> > > > patches > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches > >> to > >> > > push > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if > >> not > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x > >> for > >> > > > netty4 > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we > >> can > >> > > start > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change > >> this > >> > > big > >> > > > is > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other > >> opinions. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > - Bobby > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico > Olivelli < > >> > > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers, > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce > there > >> is > >> > > some > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using > >> > native > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > How the work is going ? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Open questions are: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL > >> > > > > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work > >> from > >> > it > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4: > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now > >> from > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- Enrico > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Jvrao > >> > > --- > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, > >> then > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Jvrao > > --- > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > > > > > > > > > -- > Jvrao > --- > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > -- -- Enrico Olivelli
