What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join the right one this time.
- Bobby On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Great! I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2017-2-24+Meeting+notes Enrico 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com>: > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch. > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has takes > to Netty 4.1.7. > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a different > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want to make > > sure we have the backing of the community on this. > > > > > > - Bobby > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a try. > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. Our > code > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see what > > differences there are with the API. > > > > - Bobby > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects > > and I am very +1 on the switch > > to Netty 4 > > > > @Sijie what do you think ? > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of > > the first port ? > > > > > > Enrico > > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>: > > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. Simply > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in production so > > we > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of other > > patches > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches to > push > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if not > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x for > > netty4 > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we can > start > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change this > big > > is > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other opinions. > > > > > > > > > - Bobby > > > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers, > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is > some > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native > > > OpenSSL + netty 4. > > > > > > How the work is going ? > > > > > > Open questions are: > > > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL > > > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ? > > > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4: > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now from > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x. > > > > > > What are your current thoughts ? > > > > > > -- Enrico > > > > > > > > > -- > Jvrao > --- > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi >
