+1 brooklyn-cli On 24 November 2015 at 14:05, Mark McKenna <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1: brooklyn-cli > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 14:04 Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1: brooklyn-cli > > > > > > On 24/11/2015 13:59, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > > Brooklyners, > > > > > > Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread to David and Geoff's > > > proposal, I move to starting a vote for the creation of a separate git > > > repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the creation of the repo, > > > and its name. The name with the largest number of vote wins, unless > > > strong objections will send us back to the drawing board. This vote is > > > *not* for the name of the executable (br or bk). > > > > > > [+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this name: a heneveld proposal) > > > [+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo with this name: mzaccardo > > > proposal) > > > [-1] we do not need a separate repo > > > > > > Please cast your vote. The vote is open for 72+ hours. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Hadrian > > > > -- > > *Mark McKenna* > > *Twitter :: @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>* > > *PGP :: public-key > <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7>* >
