Changing vote:
+1 brooklyn-client
If you've voted and you like this please consider changing!
I know there are other types of clients (jsgui, stubs) but there are
other CLI's also (e.g. server-cli). brooklyn-client-cli would be
possible, but I think the CLI is what we want to emphasise, and in the
interest of simplicity the following feels pretty good and has a nice
symmetry:
* brooklyn-server
* brooklyn-client
* brooklyn-ui
(Detailed updated discuss and vote for repos to follow.)
Best
Alex
On 24/11/2015 15:00, Andrea Turli wrote:
+1 brooklyn-cli
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 15:59 David Lloyd <[email protected]>
wrote:
+1 brooklyn-cli
On 24 November 2015 at 14:05, Mark McKenna <[email protected]
wrote:
+1: brooklyn-cli
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 14:04 Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote:
+1: brooklyn-cli
On 24/11/2015 13:59, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Brooklyners,
Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread to David and Geoff's
proposal, I move to starting a vote for the creation of a separate
git
repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the creation of the repo,
and its name. The name with the largest number of vote wins, unless
strong objections will send us back to the drawing board. This vote
is
*not* for the name of the executable (br or bk).
[+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this name: a heneveld proposal)
[+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo with this name: mzaccardo
proposal)
[-1] we do not need a separate repo
Please cast your vote. The vote is open for 72+ hours.
Cheers,
Hadrian
--
*Mark McKenna*
*Twitter :: @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>*
*PGP :: public-key
<https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7>*
