+ 1 on separate repo +1 for brooklyn-client
———————————————————— Gnu PGP key - http://is.gd/TTTTuI > On 25 Nov 2015, at 20:57, David Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for the change to brooklyn-client > > On 25 November 2015 at 17:55, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There are two parts for this vote, one the creation of a *separate* repo, >> second the *name* of the repo. The name of the repo matters less than the >> name of the delivered artifact and I agree that brooklyn-client is slightly >> more expressive than cli. >> >> +1 on the change. Agree we don't need another vote, unless the change will >> create contention, which is not likely imho, given the nature of the >> amendment. >> >> Cheers, >> Hadrian >> >> >> >> >> On 11/25/2015 12:37 PM, Alex Heneveld wrote: >> >>> >>> Changing vote: >>> >>> +1 brooklyn-client >>> >>> If you've voted and you like this please consider changing! >>> >>> I know there are other types of clients (jsgui, stubs) but there are >>> other CLI's also (e.g. server-cli). brooklyn-client-cli would be >>> possible, but I think the CLI is what we want to emphasise, and in the >>> interest of simplicity the following feels pretty good and has a nice >>> symmetry: >>> >>> * brooklyn-server >>> * brooklyn-client >>> * brooklyn-ui >>> >>> (Detailed updated discuss and vote for repos to follow.) >>> >>> Best >>> Alex >>> >>> >>> On 24/11/2015 15:00, Andrea Turli wrote: >>> >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli >>>> >>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 15:59 David Lloyd <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli >>>>> >>>>> On 24 November 2015 at 14:05, Mark McKenna >>>>> <[email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 14:04 Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 24/11/2015 13:59, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Brooklyners, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread to David and Geoff's >>>>>>>> proposal, I move to starting a vote for the creation of a separate >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> git >>>>> >>>>>> repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the creation of the repo, >>>>>>>> and its name. The name with the largest number of vote wins, unless >>>>>>>> strong objections will send us back to the drawing board. This vote >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> is >>>>> >>>>>> *not* for the name of the executable (br or bk). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this name: a heneveld proposal) >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo with this name: mzaccardo >>>>>>>> proposal) >>>>>>>> [-1] we do not need a separate repo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please cast your vote. The vote is open for 72+ hours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Hadrian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>> *Mark McKenna* >>>>>> >>>>>> *Twitter :: @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>* >>>>>> >>>>>> *PGP :: public-key >>>>>> <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7>* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>
