+1 brooklyn-client in a sep. repo On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:01 PM Geoff Macartney < [email protected]> wrote:
> + 1 on separate repo > +1 for brooklyn-client > > > ———————————————————— > Gnu PGP key - http://is.gd/TTTTuI > > > > On 25 Nov 2015, at 20:57, David Lloyd <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > +1 for the change to brooklyn-client > > > > On 25 November 2015 at 17:55, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> There are two parts for this vote, one the creation of a *separate* > repo, > >> second the *name* of the repo. The name of the repo matters less than > the > >> name of the delivered artifact and I agree that brooklyn-client is > slightly > >> more expressive than cli. > >> > >> +1 on the change. Agree we don't need another vote, unless the change > will > >> create contention, which is not likely imho, given the nature of the > >> amendment. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Hadrian > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 11/25/2015 12:37 PM, Alex Heneveld wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Changing vote: > >>> > >>> +1 brooklyn-client > >>> > >>> If you've voted and you like this please consider changing! > >>> > >>> I know there are other types of clients (jsgui, stubs) but there are > >>> other CLI's also (e.g. server-cli). brooklyn-client-cli would be > >>> possible, but I think the CLI is what we want to emphasise, and in the > >>> interest of simplicity the following feels pretty good and has a nice > >>> symmetry: > >>> > >>> * brooklyn-server > >>> * brooklyn-client > >>> * brooklyn-ui > >>> > >>> (Detailed updated discuss and vote for repos to follow.) > >>> > >>> Best > >>> Alex > >>> > >>> > >>> On 24/11/2015 15:00, Andrea Turli wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 15:59 David Lloyd < > [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli > >>>>> > >>>>> On 24 November 2015 at 14:05, Mark McKenna > >>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 14:04 Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 24/11/2015 13:59, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Brooklyners, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread to David and Geoff's > >>>>>>>> proposal, I move to starting a vote for the creation of a separate > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> git > >>>>> > >>>>>> repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the creation of the repo, > >>>>>>>> and its name. The name with the largest number of vote wins, > unless > >>>>>>>> strong objections will send us back to the drawing board. This > vote > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> is > >>>>> > >>>>>> *not* for the name of the executable (br or bk). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this name: a heneveld > proposal) > >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo with this name: mzaccardo > >>>>>>>> proposal) > >>>>>>>> [-1] we do not need a separate repo > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Please cast your vote. The vote is open for 72+ hours. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>> Hadrian > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> *Mark McKenna* > >>>>>> > >>>>>> *Twitter :: @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>* > >>>>>> > >>>>>> *PGP :: public-key > >>>>>> <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7>* > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >
