+1 for the change to brooklyn-client On 25 November 2015 at 17:55, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are two parts for this vote, one the creation of a *separate* repo, > second the *name* of the repo. The name of the repo matters less than the > name of the delivered artifact and I agree that brooklyn-client is slightly > more expressive than cli. > > +1 on the change. Agree we don't need another vote, unless the change will > create contention, which is not likely imho, given the nature of the > amendment. > > Cheers, > Hadrian > > > > > On 11/25/2015 12:37 PM, Alex Heneveld wrote: > >> >> Changing vote: >> >> +1 brooklyn-client >> >> If you've voted and you like this please consider changing! >> >> I know there are other types of clients (jsgui, stubs) but there are >> other CLI's also (e.g. server-cli). brooklyn-client-cli would be >> possible, but I think the CLI is what we want to emphasise, and in the >> interest of simplicity the following feels pretty good and has a nice >> symmetry: >> >> * brooklyn-server >> * brooklyn-client >> * brooklyn-ui >> >> (Detailed updated discuss and vote for repos to follow.) >> >> Best >> Alex >> >> >> On 24/11/2015 15:00, Andrea Turli wrote: >> >>> +1 brooklyn-cli >>> >>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 15:59 David Lloyd <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 brooklyn-cli >>>> >>>> On 24 November 2015 at 14:05, Mark McKenna >>>> <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1: brooklyn-cli >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 14:04 Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 24/11/2015 13:59, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Brooklyners, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread to David and Geoff's >>>>>>> proposal, I move to starting a vote for the creation of a separate >>>>>>> >>>>>> git >>>> >>>>> repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the creation of the repo, >>>>>>> and its name. The name with the largest number of vote wins, unless >>>>>>> strong objections will send us back to the drawing board. This vote >>>>>>> >>>>>> is >>>> >>>>> *not* for the name of the executable (br or bk). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this name: a heneveld proposal) >>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo with this name: mzaccardo >>>>>>> proposal) >>>>>>> [-1] we do not need a separate repo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please cast your vote. The vote is open for 72+ hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Hadrian >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>> *Mark McKenna* >>>>> >>>>> *Twitter :: @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>* >>>>> >>>>> *PGP :: public-key >>>>> <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7>* >>>>> >>>>> >>
