+1 regards, gerhard
2012/3/19 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> > Apparently the selection of slf4j might not suit everyone. While I am > comfortable enough with its API (I prefer slf5j), it does cause us to > impose downstream dependencies on our users that aren't really > necessary. As an implementation of an EE specification it would be > nice of us to impose dependencies, particularly ones that require a > degree of manual intervention like slf4j, on our users only when > absolutely necessary. We have 233 .java files in src/main folders, > only 10 of which contain the String "slf4j" by which I guess that we > are only logging a very small amount of information, in which case we > might consider ourselves better citizens to simply use jul for BVal > regardless of how we may feel about it in the context of implementing > applications. > > Thoughts? > > Matt >
