+1
On Monday, March 19, 2012, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2012/3/19 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> > >> Apparently the selection of slf4j might not suit everyone. While I am >> comfortable enough with its API (I prefer slf5j), it does cause us to >> impose downstream dependencies on our users that aren't really >> necessary. As an implementation of an EE specification it would be >> nice of us to impose dependencies, particularly ones that require a >> degree of manual intervention like slf4j, on our users only when >> absolutely necessary. We have 233 .java files in src/main folders, >> only 10 of which contain the String "slf4j" by which I guess that we >> are only logging a very small amount of information, in which case we >> might consider ourselves better citizens to simply use jul for BVal >> regardless of how we may feel about it in the context of implementing >> applications. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Matt >> > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
