I am totally OK for doing the unification after the Gradle migration.

Other than that, I had a quick look and left some comments directly in the
PR. I will try to test it when I find some time.

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:27 PM Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The Gradle build scripts are ready (
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1571 )
> There might be minor issues like "a resource file missing in one of the
> jars",
> however, I expect there will be no more major changes.
>
>
> Unfortunately, there are changes that prevent building with both Maven and
> Gradle from the same commit.
> For instance, Maven uses
> "core/src/main/resources/version/org-apache-calcite-jdbc.properties" for
> figuring out driver version.
> And Gradle build just generates CalciteDriverVersion.java
> I don't want to over-engineer pom.xml files, so I did not try to make
> pom.xml files buildable.
> However, pom.xml files will be removed right after Gradle script is merged.
>
> The other change is Druid migrated from JUnit4 to JUnit5 (to enable the use
> of Assumptions).
>
> I'm inclined to commit the change, so please feel free to review it.
>
> In case you missed, you can start playing with the build with the commands
> that are listed in the commit message:
>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1571/commits/4bbf1cdeac6e09959e027eaa482a67937228bf9d
> "./gradlew tasks" could be a good start.
>
> The file movements/edits are minimal, so I hope it won't affect pending
> PRs.
>
>
> Note, as I said earlier, having both Avatica and Calcite in Gradle enables
> us to load both projects to the IDE at the same time.
> In the same way, one can test who Avatica fix impacts Calcite with a single
> command line. No changes to pom.xml needed!!!
>
> The procedure is to clone calcite-avatica and calcite side by side, and use
> -PlocalAvatica property.
>
> Vladimir
>

Reply via email to