> -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 11:47 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: 'Chip Childers'; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com) > Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2 > > > On May 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > So I am confused looks like Nicolas was not using this feature as it was not > supported for Vmware any way so how is upgrade blocked? > > > > Animesh, I talked with nicolas and the way I understand it is that they had to > enable SG to set their VLANs in advanced zone the way they needed to. > They actually did not use the SG functionality. Beats me but I don't know > 2.2.14(13) [Animesh>] I am not sure why would SG be needed to set their VLANs in advanced zone? If Anthony's patch is available in 4.1 wouldn't it fix the issue or is it that upgrade gets stuck in intermediate step during upgrade to 4.0?
> > -sebastien > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:18 AM > >> To: 'Chip Childers'; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Wei Zhou > >> (w.z...@leaseweb.com) > >> Subject: RE: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs > >> 4.2 > >> > >> I'm afraid it might introduce extra effort to allow them to use SG > >> again if they manage to upgrade to 4.1. > >> I already checked in the patch in 4-2-advanced-zone-security-group > >> from master and did some basic tests. > >> Wei Zhou kindly agreed to do more tests in that branch and add some > >> integration test cases. I think after this we can merge this branch > >> to master and 4.1. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Anthony > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 7:01 AM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Cc: Anthony Xu > >> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs > >> 4.2 > >> > >> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:59:06PM +0200, > >> nicolas.lamira...@orange.com > >> wrote: > >>> Le 16/05/2013 15:56, Chip Childers a écrit : > >>>> If we were able to upgrade you correctly to 4.1, but security > >>>> groups were not yet functional, would that suffice? > >>> > >>> yes. > >> > >> Anthony, > >> > >> Since VMware support for SG's in Advanced zones isn't in your current > >> scope for the feature work, is there a method to enable an upgrade if > >> SG's aren't actually in use but the user's are blocked from upgrades now?
