Dave, It also has to be with native swift API. It can't be exposing S3 API or their own API but using swift in the back end.
--Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 7:45 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Chip Childers <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:39 AM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 05:53 PM, Edison Su wrote: > >>>> Oh man, my two hours are wasted on devstack already. After > >>>> installed devstack, there is no swift service at all. > >>> > >>> For Edison, and anybody else who wants to use Swift with CloudStack, > >>> what about SwiftStack? > >>> > >>> http://swiftstack.com/docs/install/index.html > >>> > >>> I think you have to request a trial account, but it looks not overly > >>> difficult. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> > >>> jzb > >>> -- > >>> Joe Brockmeier > >>> [email protected] > >>> Twitter: @jzb > >>> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ > >> > >> I am curious why we'd set this up at all? > >> There are several public cloud providers offering swift as a service. > >> If all we are doing is testing, why wouldn't we just use one of them? > >> > >> --David > >> > > > > Any *free* ones? ;-) > > So I know of at least one project that has free access - let me confirm with > the provider that they'd be amenable to us using it. > > --David
