On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Turner <stephen.tur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> I have to admit I'm a bit sceptical because when we did have a four-month > release cycle, we never seemed to manage to meet it. Personally I think > six-monthly might be easier. > > Having said that, part of the problem was the long close-down period where > we kept finding critical bugs, so more automated testing might help to > shorten the cycle. > > - Shorter cycle means that it's less of a problem to miss a deadline, meaning you can spend more time on QA. - Longer cycle means that it could be critical to meet the deadline, meaning you might end up doing less QA while stressing to get your feature in. My $.002 -- Erik
