On 07 Apr 2004, at 11:09, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
The issue is not so technical as it's of indipendence from something that, in the good and the bad, has not helped Cocoon be built by Gump for ages now.
As much as I like "Gumpinal Correctness" for the sanity of us Cocoon committers, I'm not sure whether Gump has the goal of driving architectural decisions for the projects it is aggregating information from. It is a helper tool and should not decide for us, no?
Gump is deciding for us? Did I read "Gump wrote?" :-P
The fact is that a tool tells me that a project we depend upon does not get built regularly: this *does* impact on architectural decisions.
Remember? Build on sand, build on stone... maybe you haven't been reading.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------