Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > Honestly, I don't see the need for such a change now that the > logger type can be chosen in web.xml. > This is a big concern for users, they simply want to use log4j.
> Also, long ago, I compared the code of LogKit and Log4J and > found constructs in Log4J that made it intrinsically much > more slower than LogKit just to check is a log level is > enabled. It would be good to do a performance comparison with > the latest versions, as we have so many > getLogger().isDebugEnabled() around... > Ok, that's a good point. Now log4j always claims to be the fastest logging system, so I guess this isn't an issue anymore. Carsten
