Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >> > >Ok, that's a good point. Now log4j always claims to be the fastest > >logging system, so I guess this isn't an issue anymore. > > > > > > Well, they claimed it at that time also. Log4J has some very > good marketing ;-) > :) "Marketing is everything!"
Ok, I just checked the code. It seems that logkit is doing one check (testing ints) for "isDebugEnabled()" while log4j is doing two. Now this shouldn't really affect the performance I think. Carsten
