Carsten Ziegeler dijo: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: >> >> >> >Ok, that's a good point. Now log4j always claims to be the fastest >> >logging system, so I guess this isn't an issue anymore. >> > >> > >> >> Well, they claimed it at that time also. Log4J has some very >> good marketing ;-) >> > :) "Marketing is everything!" > > Ok, I just checked the code. It seems that logkit is doing one > check (testing ints) for "isDebugEnabled()" while log4j is > doing two. Now this shouldn't really affect the performance I think.
Hmmm.... Every milisec count! :-D Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
