Reinhard Poetz wrote: > I think it will be a question of doing it. :)
> If Ugo presents a > functional prototyp of Spring that supports Real Blocks and > which can be made backwards compatible to 2.1 sitemaps and > flowscripts I wouldn't have arguments against it :-) > Yepp. > Is anyone else working on an alternative these days? > (Carsten, Pier ???) No, not me, my focus was to implement everything else we wanted to have for 2.2 except blocks; but it seems that even the innocent looking VPCs are way too complicated :( Carsten
