On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:17:37 +0200, Ugo Cei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Il giorno 13/ott/04, alle 11:35, Luca Garulli ha scritto: > > > Why don't use JDO for the persistence? JDO allows to Daisy to be > > datastore independent. So you can run Daisy on top of an ODBMS or > > RDBMS or again the file system. > > Probably because everyone has his own likes and dislikes when it comes > to accessing data stores, so while JDO might be fine with you, others > may prefer OJB, Hibernate, Cayenne, iBatis, straight JDBC or something > entirely different. Even if you decided to adopt JDO, you would have to > find a reasonably performant, stable, opensource implementation.
This is the point. Using JDO allow you to switch the JDO implementation and obviously repository without lock to a product!!! Isn't enought? I don't speak about product preference. I'm talking of STANDARD. JDO is a STANDARD. > Preferably of JDO 2, since I wouldn't actually recommend any JDO 1 > implementation to anyone. I know that JDO 2 has much more features than JDO 1, but better JDO 1 than a custom product or (another) custom-own implementation. -- bye, Luca Garulli OrienTechnologies.com (the light ODBMS, all in one JDO solution)
